{No plaque that we could find.}
The inclined needle is made of Portland stone, 16m high. It won a Natural Stone Craftsmanship Award 2000. We could find no plaque and there is no pretty carving to photograph so for our close-up shot we have photographed the glass-covered cavity that holds the lighting, and a life-form that could have come from outer-space.
Site: Southwark Gateway Needle (1 memorial)
SE1, London Bridge
Although we can find no plaque or even official notice on-line, there seems to be general agreement that this Needle commemorates the spikes on London Bridge that used to bear the heads of those executed at the Tower of London. It was erected as part of the Southwark Gateway project by . . The project included an "emblematic" Tourist Information Centre and we wonder if that is now (2012) occupied by Evans Cycles.
2016, but see 2024 below: The all-knowing has apparently solved the mystery of this spike. They have discovered that, in an article in the 2014 Fortean Times, the architects explain that it is a marker. "Tilted at 19.5 degrees to point down to a specific spot. Follow the trajectory of the needle downwards and it points to the riverside opposite the City church St Magus the Martyr. This is where the medieval London Bridge crossed the river." The point described is usefully marked with a plaque: Old London Bridge.
We can't see it ourselves. There are lots of angles on the thing but the only one that could be 19.5 degrees is that from the vertical. Surely if the needle is pointing anywhere it's into the sky? Look at it in satellite view and you see its top is pointing south-west, while its lower end is pointing north-east on a trajectory that would cross the northern bank near Old Billingsgate, far east of the old London Bridge. Are we missing something?
We conclude that this is an aesthetically pleasing object that possibly commemorates the bridge in an indecipherably abstract way.
2024: José de Paiva of Eric Parry Architects wrote asking us to correct some information on this page. He described the paragraph dated 2016 as: “fanciful and blatantly wrong. Eric Parry Architects have never made any such statements, which are nonsense. Please remove them.” Instead of removing the incorrect information we prefer to publish the correction, being the best way to prevent incorrect or inaccurate information spreading.
José de Paiva also commented on our two paragraphs above: “ We can’t see it ourselves...” and “We conclude…”. He writes “Your interpretation is correct.”
We are grateful to José de Paiva for taking the time to set the record straight.
Comments are provided by Facebook, please ensure you are signed in to see them