91³Ô¹ÏÍø

It is hard to understand how camouflaging a building could deter bombs, which by their nature do not discriminate in where they fall. We have contacted Hackney Council to try and find out if anyone knows the logic behind this, but to no avail. Strangely though, it appears to have worked, as although the surrounding area was badly damaged, the town hall escaped virtually intact. Part of the camouflage paint can be seen by the window next to the tree on the left of the photograph.

December 2020: Paul wrote to tell us: "My father George C. Carter was a councillor at the time and the driver for camouflaging Hackney Town Hall. The building was brand new and bright white. It was thought it could be used as a Navigation landmark by German aircraft. He was much criticised and verbally abused as the lovely new building was 'vandalized' with camouflage drab. That's the reasoning."

We thank Paul for that. We have heard elsewhere that efforts were made to minimise navigational assistance given to German pilots. So it would make sense to disguise what might be a landmark. The text on the plaque is misleading.

Whilst on the subject of camouflage paint:  in wartime when ships are so painted it's called and the intention is not to hide the ship but to make its speed and direction of travel more difficult to determine. Thus firing a missile accurately becomes more difficult for the enemy's rangefinders.

2025: has the story of how the Government tried to camouflage the Thames.

Comments are provided by Facebook, please ensure you are signed in to see them