91³Ô¹ÏÍø

We have a query concerning the designe of this statue . . .  Firstly, note that in 1883 Boehm had already produced a similar Napier statue for Calcutta, see the , c. 1905 (ref. ). Boehm died in 1890 while working on this London statue so it was completed by Gilbert, but since it is (near)-identical to the Calcutta one, this work must have been minimal. Originally erected in 1891 in Waterloo Place (image at and at ) the statue was evicted in 1921 to make room for Mackennal’s equestrian Edward VII.  

In a we’ve read that the slope of the ground on which Napier’s horse stands was prompted by the lie of the land in Waterloo Place. This makes no sense, for at least 3 reasons.  Firstly, the slope in Waterloo Place is really quite gentle – the Pastscape image shows practically no slope.  Secondly, what was the sculpted hillock intended to achieve? What problem did the ground slope create that the sculpted slope would overcome?  

Then consider that Mackennal was perfectly happy with his horse, at the same site, presented on level ground, and it looks fine.  And the clincher is that Calcutta statue (remember that?) – it was created before the London one and it has the slope, even though it was erected on totally level ground.  So we think the slope was a purely aesthetic feature, unrelated to the site, intended to make the horse and rider more imposing.  Whatever … Napier and his mount trotted over to SW7 and found a home here in level Queen’s Gate. 

Another little puzzle: the pdf says the Calcutta statue “originally stood on Napier Road”.   That’s a road beside the Hoogly River and we’ve found it in Google Maps but there is no Streetview.  Apart from the we can find no other image, and the “originally” suggests the statue was moved. But where to? At one stage we thought it might be the one erected in London, but the "1905" on the Calcutta photo scuppers that idea.